While Shaggy shows hints of true Paranoid personality disorder, it's clearly not full blown as he generally trusts the rest of the Mystery Inc. Norville "Shaggy" Rogers (Diagnosis: Cowardly Pothead with Hints of Paranoia) It's an interesting conundrum, but if you think about it long enough it makes sense. Her behavior clearly teaches to have a greater understanding of the world through having a less than flexible attitude towards it. gang in being the one to pull the "great reveal" at the end of each episode. Along with Fred, Velma is the primary case solver and leads the Mystery Inc. Velma is very adept at solving puzzles and putting together the pieces, due to her expectations of the order of things, and her constant anxiety that something is amiss. You see, while it is a disorder, Velma shows that having a certain order to things in life helps you understand what is out of place and is able to provide her with a keen view of the unseen clues. Out of all the gang though, having OCPD and choosing to solve mysteries for a living isn't actually a bad thing. This doesn't mean that Velma expects everything to be in a straight line, just that she expects things to be how she expects them to be. It has to with order, rules and expectations and this causes anxiety when things are out of a certain expected order. No, OCPD is when everything needs to be just so. Not to be confused with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, which is a high anxiety disorder that causes bad thoughts and compulsions and what not. Velma Dinkley (Diagnosis: Obsessive–Compulsive Personality Disorder) This complete change from being a helpless pretty girl to a self sufficient woman changed the character of Daphne and hopefully inspired many self centered "princesses" to do the same. She learned martial arts, she learned how to pick locks and while never as intelligent as Velma or Fred still developed useful problem solving skills. While she started off as a poor model for young girls' confidence (look pretty and the big strong man will come rushing to your rescue) she turned into a very independent woman. The interesting thing about Daphne though, in relation to being dependent, is that she got better. She was the classic "damsel in distress." Clearly his affection and appreciation for her personal well being and presence kept her disorder fueled. She always needed to be rescued from said kidnappings, and usually it was Fred to her rescue. She is accident prone and almost nearly always finds herself being kidnapped or accidentally breaking something, therefore remaining the center of attention which, similar to narcissism, was based more on dependence. Which is why it's been entertaining the hell out of me for all these years.ĭaphne Blake (Diagnosis: Dependent Personality Disorder)īeing "the pretty one," Daphne comes from a wealthy background. While this may sound a little bit nutty, and I'm sure the oncoming onslaught from the fanboy trolls will show, pointing out the psychological problems in cartoon characters is more than obsessive geekiness, it's ridiculous. As we had a habit of dressing up or behaving like our favorite characters, if the influence was great enough, some of us may have taken away more from their behavior than we may realize. They weren't boilerplate they were designed a certain way, with certain problems that we - as children - may have absorbed into our subconscious. And for the purpose of this article, we felt the tension of the Scooby-Doo gang as they searched for answers as to who was haunting the amusement park.Īs I got older, and the cartoons seemed more like cartoons than reality I started to notice the inherent humanity presented in the characters. We laughed along with the irreverent behavior of the Hanna-Barbera characters as they raced or exited stage left. Probably that had to do more with his princely man skirt though. We sympathized with the daily struggle of Prince Adam as he faced ridicule that He-Man wasn't subject to. Joe as they fought Cobra Commander and his less than capable fighting force. Clearly I represent a particular generation, and those older than me might not share the same sentiment, while those younger have probably already lost interest and are chasing the sunlight coming in through the window.Īside from the lessons learned, there was a bond we shared with the characters in these cartoons. There are still cartoons that present certain lessons to take away, but nothing compared to the cartoons of our youth in the 1980s. Cartoons have exponentially changed over the past 30 years in that they have morphed into basic insanity. We grew up on cartoons, and the lessons found therein. Cartoons are an ingrained part of our culture.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |